See table SDC-II or further stratification according to study design (double blind versus open label) Overall Safety Data Table III shows the summary of the safety data for all patients, subdivided between double-blind studies and open-label studies, respectively. As for any drug, a gradual decrease in the incidence of events was seen when looking from all AEs down to ADRs and further to SADRs. To help identify the highest incidence rates and imbalances between the treatment groups affecting a specific event, the data were filtered, and situations Tariquidar order are highlighted where (i) there was a 2-fold difference between treatment arms for events with an incidence <2.5% in either of the treatment groups or a ≥2.5% difference between treatments

for events with an incidence ≥2.5% in both groups and (ii) the number of patients experiencing an event was ≥10 in either treatment group. With these filters, the differences between moxifloxacin and comparators were related to (i) AEs and SAEs in the intravenous double-blind studies; and (ii) AEs, ADRs, and SADRs in Selleck Liproxstatin-1 the oral studies, SADRs in the intravenous/oral studies, and premature discontinuation due to AE in the intravenous open-label studies. Concerning SADRs reported in open-label oral and intravenous/oral studies, the numbers of patients with such events were small in each treatment group (moxifloxacin 12 [0.7%] versus comparator 5 [0.2%]

in the oral studies; moxifloxacin 42 [2.7%] versus comparator 19 [1.2%] in the intravenous/oral studies). In the

intravenous/oral studies, the difference in incidence rates (1.5%) was driven by gastrointestinal Molecular motor disorders (mostly diarrhea: 8 cases [0.5%] for moxifloxacin versus 1 case [<0.1%] for comparator) and results of investigations (10 cases [0.6%] for moxifloxacin versus 1 case [<0.1%] for comparator), including asymptomatic prolongation of the QT interval. Table III Summary of safety data for patients valid for the safety analysis, treated with moxifloxacin or a comparator and stratified by route of administration (oral only; intravenous followed by oral [sequential]; intravenous only) and by study design. An asterisk (*) indicates differences observed between treatment groups in disfavor of moxifloxacin that were ≥2.5% for events with an incidence ≥2.5% in both groups or ≥2-fold for events with an incidence <2.5% in one or both groups and for which the number of patients experiencing an event was ≥10 in either group Adverse Events (AEs) Rates of treatment-emergent AEs (classified by MedDRA SOC and PTs) based on study design are presented in table SDC-III. Reported AEs with ≥5% incidence for patients in the double-blind studies included wound infections (moxifloxacin 11.7% versus comparator 7.4% [intravenous; corresponding mainly to patients treated for cIAIs and cSSSI]); diarrhea (moxifloxacin 6.2% versus comparator 4.9% [oral], moxifloxacin 8.1% versus comparator 7.9% [intravenous/oral], moxifloxacin 6.3% versus comparator 4.