These data reiterate that future investigation efforts should be

These data reiterate that future investigation efforts should be focused less on the method of rcvascularization and more on identification of patient cohorts at risk for failure regardless of treatment. (J Vasc Surg 2009;50:534-41.)”
“OBJECTIVE: Quantifying vasospasm has traditionally been performed manually, a method prone to imprecision and user bias. An alternative approach is to use computerized image analysis techniques to define and quantify the diameter of a vessel. The goal of this article is to demonstrate a novel automated vessel measurement algorithm specific to the needs of vasospasm studies and to compare it with traditional

manual measurements in an animal model of vasospasm.

METHODS: A total of 576 arterial diameter measurements were collected by 4 independent, blinded examiners from 24 angiograms in a rabbit subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) model. Measurements were taken from 3 segments of the basilar AZD1208 order artery in anteroposterior and lateral projections, both before SAH and after SAH-induced vasospasm. Means and standard deviations of 288 manual measurements were compared with 288 automated measurements.

RESULTS:The precision of automated measurements was significantly improved compared with standardized manual measurements (85.7% decrease in variation; P < .001). When using automated measurements,

the precision was not affected by vessel size, but when using manual measurements, smaller Ferrostatin-1 price arteries were less precise (P = .04). There was no significant difference in precision between 2 different contrast concentrations (P = 32).

CONCLUSION: Automated measurements of basilar artery diameters are more precise than manual measurements, both before and after SAH-induced vasospasm. Lormetazepam The variability in the manual group worsens when the artery is smaller secondary to vasospasm, indicating a need for the use of this segmentation method.”
“Objectives: Over the last decade, the number of endovascular procedures performed on the superficial femoral (SFA) and popliteal arteries (PA) has significantly increased. There

is no consensus on the optimal form of intervention used in this arterial segment. While some have advocated balloon angioplasty alone, others have championed either selective or primary stenting of these lesions. It is the purpose of this study to determine the efficacy and durability of primary stenting of the superficial femoral and popliteal artery.

Methods. All patients undergoing peripheral angioplasty by a single vascular surgeon were prospectively enrolled in an Institutional Review Board-approved, primary-stenting protocol. During a 44-month period, all patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the SFA or PA also received primary arterial stenting with bare, self-expanding nitinol stents. Patient demographics and risk factors were identified.

Comments are closed.