, 2009), Drosophilaelegans ( Hirai et al., 1999) and Drosophilamojavensis ( Krebs, 1991)). Correlates of sex specific control of mating duration, such as female resistance behaviour in the form of ‘shaking’ have also been investigated in theory and empirical tests ( Blanckenhorn et al., 2007). Our aim was selleck to use a direct assay for male-specific control of variation
in mating duration specifically in response to sexual competition. We tested for male control of mating duration following exposure to rivals by using live decapitated and immobilised females. In this way, the expression of the shared trait could be measured, as males will still vigorously court and mate with immobilised and decapitated females (Cook and Cook, 1975, Grossfield, 1972 and Spieth, 1966). However, such females have significantly reduced responses to males, allowing us to detect male and female influences. We predicted that, if males are controlling mating
duration in the context of increased sexual competition, then mating duration would be extended after a period this website of exposure to a rival in both intact and decapitated females. We also predicted that female status (intact versus decapitated) should have a significant effect on female attractiveness manifested, for example, as an effect of female treatment on mating latency. Fly rearing and all experiments were conducted in a 25 °C humidified room, with a 12:12 h light:dark cycle. Flies were maintained in glass vials (75 × 25 mm) containing 8 ml standard sugar–yeast medium (Bass et al., 2007). Wild type flies were from a large laboratory population originally collected in the 1970s in Dahomey (Benin), as used previously in our related studies (Bretman et al., 2009, Bretman et al., 2010, Bretman et al., 2011b and Bretman et al., 2012). Larvae were raised at a standard Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) density of
100 per vial, supplemented with live yeast liquid. At eclosion, flies were collected and the sexes separated using ice anaesthesia. Males were assigned randomly to two treatments, either maintained singly or exposed to a rival male for three days until the matings occurred. Rival males were identified by using a small wing clip (wing tips were clipped using a scalpel under CO2 anaesthesia). Virgin females were stored 10 per vial on medium supplemented with live yeast granules, until the day of mating at 4 days post eclosion. Up to 1 h before the introduction of a male, females were either aspirated singly into fresh vials, or, using CO2 anaesthesia, decapitated and pinned through the thorax onto the surface of the food, using a fine mounting pin (0.20 mm, Austerlitz). Focal males were then introduced to the vials containing intact or decapitated females and mating latency and duration recorded. Pairs were given 2 h to mate. In a pilot study, we optimised the positioning of the pinned females just above the food surface to maximise opportunities.