SETTING: Department of Orthoptics and Visual

Science, Kitasato University School, Sagamihara, Japan.

METHODS: The repeatability and agreement of UBM and scanning-slit DZNeP nmr topography were assessed using the intraclass correlation (ICC) and the Bland and Altman method (ie, mean difference and 95% limits of agreement [LoA])

RESULTS: Thirty-one normal eyes of 31 subjects (mean age 22.6 years +/- 4.8 [SD]) were evaluated. The mean differences between the repeated measurements were as follows ciliary sulcus diameter, -005 mm (95% LoA, -0.38 to 0.28 mm), anterior chamber diameter, 0 02 mm (95% LoA, -0.42 to 045 mm), and WTW diameter. 002 mm (95% LoA, -0.18 to 0 13 mm). The agreement between ciliary sulcus diameter and WTW diameter was poor (ICC, 0.679) The mean difference was 0.41 mm (95% LoA. -0.46 to 1.28 mm) The agreement between the

ciliary sulcus diameter and anterior chamber diameter was high (ICC. 0.918). The mean difference was 0.13 mm (95% LoA, -0.41 to 0.67 mm)

CONCLUSION: RG-7112 mw Results suggest that direct measurement of the ciliary sulcus by UBM would reduce the percentage of complications related to intraocular lens sizing over the percentage when sizing is based on WTW diameter”
“We study the geometric, electronic, and magnetic properties of TM monodoped and bidoped (TM=Mn, Fe, Co) InnSbn (n=7-12,14,16) clusters using the first principles of density functional theory. For monodoping, three doping modes (substitutional, endohedral, and exohedral doping) are considered. The calculations suggest that TM-doped InnSbn(n=7-12,14,16) clusters are magnetic except Co-doped In7Sb7 and Co-doped In14Sb14. The lowest energy configurations of TM2In16Sb16 clusters

are ferromagnetic (FM) with the TM atoms at the nearest neighbor position and the coupling between the TM atoms is mainly governed by the FM interaction via TM-TM direct interaction. The hybridization between Mn 3d state and the Sb 5p state is also favorable to the stability of FM state. (C) 2011 American Institute of Entinostat Physics. [doi:10.1063/1.3531533]“
“Electrochemical copolymerizations of 2,3-di(2-thienyl)quinoxaline (M1), 6-methyl-2,3-di(2-thienyl)quinoxaline (M2), and 2,3-di(2-thienyl)quinoxaline-6-yl)(phenyl)methanone (M3) with 3,4-ethylenedioxy thiophene (EDOT) were carried out in CH(3)CN/TBABF(4) (0.1M) solvent-electrolyte couple via potentiodynamic electrolysis. The obtained copolymers were characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV), Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and thermogravimetry analyses (TGA).