5%) and partial

excision of the plaque with a vitrectome in 49 eyes (54.4%). The mean follow-up was 24.03 months +/- 2.68 (SD). Of the 60 eyes that had an IOL, 54 (90%) had in-the-bag implantation and 6 (10%) had ciliary sulcus implantation. Postoperatively, there was no IOL decentration. Visual axis obscuration developed in 6 eyes (6.7%).

CONCLUSIONS: Posterior capsule plaque was frequently observed in pediatric cataractous eyes, especially Ruboxistaurin inhibitor in eyes with total cataract. After plaque peeling or plaque removal with a vitrectome, the IOL was stable in the capsular bag and the visual axis was clear.”
“Distributed along the coastal waters of Korea and China, Octopus minor is found in various habitats, including the mud flats in the southern and western coasts of the Korean Peninsula and the rocky areas around Jeju Island; however, the genetic relationships among the different populations are unknown and have not been studied. We compared 630-nucleotide sequences of the CO1 gene from O. minor specimens collected from five regions around the Korean Peninsula and three regions from

eastern China in order to determine population structure and genetic relationships. Based on the sequences at 12 polymorphic sites in this region, 11 haplotypes were identified from 85 specimens. Individuals from Jeju Island had unique haplotypes, including two haplotypes not found in the other populations. Nucleotide and haplotype diversity for all populations ranged from 0.03-0.37 and 0.20-0.64, respectively. click here Pairwise F-ST values indicated significant genetic differences in populations from Korea and China. An UPGMA dendrogram showed separation of the eight populations into three clusters; one included only the Jeju population, another included the rest of the Korean populations and some from Dalian, China; a third SCH727965 concentration cluster consisted of two other populations

from China. We conclude that there are discrete genetic differences in O. minor from the different habitats, suggesting that the populations should be considered as management units in the ongoing recovery program.”
“Objective: The accuracy of self-reported healthcare use among individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUD) has been questioned. The present study attempts to compare the accuracy of self-reported physician visits for individuals who differ with respect to their history of AUDs.

Methods: Our data source was a 14-year follow-up of individuals interviewed at the St. Louis site of the 1981-1983 Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study (ECA). We used a case-control design (n = 237) to compare the accuracy of self-reports among ECA participants with stably diagnosed AUDs (cases; n = 75) to two comparison groups: those with problem/very heavy drinking (n = 81) and those unaffected by alcohol (n = 81). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) described the concordance between self-reports and archival records of physician visits in the prior six months.