(C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“The tumor necrosis factor superfamily (TNFSF) consists of more than 20 members that can modulate cellular and immunological functions, including cell survival and the stimulation of an inflammatory response. ARS-1620 cell line Many TNF superfamily members display potent anticancer activity when used as recombinant proteins in vitro and in vivo. While TNF, TRAIL and FasL have already been used as payloads in antibodybased

pharmacodelivery strategies, most TNF superfamily members have not yet been investigated as antibody payloads. Here, we report the cloning, production and characterization of eight novel antibody fusion proteins based on CD4OL, FasL, TRAIL, LiGHT, VEGI, lymphotoxin alpha, lymphotoxin beta and lymphotoxin alphal /beta2. The monoclonal antibody F8 was chosen as fusion partner of proven tumor targeting performance, which recognizes the alternatively-spliced EDA domain of fibronectin, a marker of angiogenesis. A quantitative biodistribution analysis performed with radioiodinated protein preparations in tumor-bearing mice revealed that TRAIL and lymphotoxin

alphal /beta2 were able to selectively accumulate at the tumor site, while all other members of the TNF superfamily abrogated find more the selective tumor targeting performance of the parental antibody or accumulated also in healthy tissues. The study indicates that even cytokines, which are closely related in terms of structure and function, may have a substantially different impact on the biodistribution and functional selleck chemicals properties of the corresponding fusions with disease-homing antibodies. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.”
“Background: Our study objective was to describe the frequency, indications, and outcomes after inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement in a population-based sample of residents of the Worcester, Massachusetts, metropolitan area who had been diagnosed as having acute venous thromboembolism

(VTE) in 1999, 2001, and 2003.\n\nMethods: A retrospective chart review of inpatient and outpatient medical records was conducted. Recorded indication(s) for IVC filter placement was determined among a subset of cases from 3 Worcester tertiary care hospitals. Three thrombosis specialists assessed the appropriateness of IVC filter placement.\n\nResults: Of 1547 greater Worcester residents with validated acute VTE and without a prior IVC filter, 203 (13.1%) had an IVC filter placed after acute VTE. Patients with an IVC filter were older, had more comorbidities, and had a higher mortality rate during 3 years of follow-up. There was unanimous agreement by panel members that the use of an IVC filter was appropriate in 51% of cases and inappropriate in 26% of cases, with no consensus in the remaining 23%.\n\nConclusions: In this community-based study, IVC filters were frequently used in the treatment of patients with acute VIE.