OVA recipients (Fig. 4C). The absence of IFN-γ production by OT-II T cells in 11c.OVA was not due to immune deviation to Th2 as no significant click here IL-4 production was induced from OT-II recovered from either 11c.OVA or nontransgenic controls recipients (Fig. 4C). No IL-10 or TGF-β production was detected in cultures established from OVA-challenged 11c.OVA or nontransgenic recipients (data

not shown). Analysis of Foxp3 expression, which might indicate Treg development, showed a slight enrichment for Foxp3-expressing cells in OT-II T cells recovered from spleens of 11c.OVA (0.45±0.15% of OT-II, mean±SEM) relative to nontransgenic (0.03±0.03%, p<0.05) recipients, but this was present in only a low proportion of cells. Thus, no evidence was found that

conversion to Treg contributed substantially to inactivation of OT-II responses. On the whole, these data indicate that in nontransgenic recipients, memory T-cell responses established by transfer of OT-II T cells were preserved, whereas in 11c.OVA recipients, memory T-cell responses were terminated through mechanisms consistent with deletion and induction of unresponsiveness. Priming and differentiation buy Navitoclax of effector and memory T-cell populations occurs during the prodromal phase of autoimmune and inflammatory responses, before tissue damage and overt symptoms are fully developed and onset of the disease is detected. For this reason, therapies selleck kinase inhibitor developed with the goal of terminating established autoimmune or inflammatory

responses will require an effective approach to silencing effector and memory T cells. Here, we demonstrate that transgenic expression of cognate antigen by steady-state DC terminates memory CD4+ T-cell responses. It has long been thought that memory T cells are resistant to tolerance induction, therefore representing a substantial impediment to therapy of established autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. Indeed, heterologous immunity is a hurdle for induction of transplantation tolerance 19 although, countering this, we have recently demonstrated that memory CD8+ T-cell responses can be terminated if cognate antigen expression is targeted to DC 4. Susceptibility of memory and effector CD4+ T cells to peripheral tolerance induction and the possible mechanisms involved is less clear. Conflicting reports indicate that under some circumstances memory CD4+ T cells are resistant to tolerance induction 20, 21, whereas under others, effector CD4+ T cells appear susceptible 22, 23. In contrast to this, in vitro observations indicate that memory or post-activated CD4+ T cells are more sensitive than naïve CD4+ T cells to anergy induction in vitro by fixed APC or agents such as ionomycin and anti-CD3 mAb 24–26. We now demonstrate that CD4+ effector/memory T-cell responses can be also terminated by cognate antigen-expressing DC.