The latter marked the beginning of the systematic collection of fishery-related data in Galapagos [14]. The PIMPP was the most important monitoring program between 1997 and 2006, particularly during the expansive phase of the sea cucumber fishery (1999–2002). However, over the past 50 years, the CDF has also compiled large amounts of other oceanographic,

ecological and biological data about Galapagos marine habitats and native and endemic species. In recent years, most monitoring efforts have focused on the project-basis collection of socioeconomic and governance data, in particular to evaluate performance of the co-management system [21], the socioeconomic impact of tourism [29], NVP-BGJ398 molecular weight and the potential impact of climate change on Galapagos [30]. According to the GMRMP,

the zoning system was to be adapted and made “permanent” two years after its declaration, based on the results of an assessment of management INCB024360 molecular weight effectiveness [17]. The latter had to include an evaluation of the initial ecological and socio-economic effects of the zoning. However, there is not yet a comprehensive, integrated, peer-reviewed quantitative analysis of marine zoning effectiveness nor of application of the EBSM principles in the GMR. As a consequence, the marine zoning scheme has not been formally adapted. Furthermore, decision-makers have not received regular and conclusive feedback about the ecological and socioeconomic impacts of the EBSM over Galapagos marine ecosystems and over

the range of activities affecting it. Despite this lack of comprehensive assessment, there is some evidence, both positive and negative, concerning the performance of marine zoning in the Galapagos. First, for the particular case of shellfish fisheries, recent studies suggest that marine zoning, in conjunction with the establishment of a co-management system, have not been effective in preventing overexploitation of the sea cucumber and the spiny lobster fisheries [31] and [14]. Both management measures have not been enough to eliminate the fishers’ incentive to Suplatast tosilate compete with each other for a bigger proportion of the total allowable catch (TAC) each fishing season. Such behavior, known worldwide as a “race for the fish”, has encouraged over-capitalization as fisherman seek to increase their competitiveness through investment in more substantial and faster vessels, and high technology fishing equipment. The resulting intense search for short-term profit, combined with a lack of social and institutional mechanisms for resource stewardship, has compromised the long-term recovery of fishery stocks. This is indeed a situation in which the “tragedy of the commons” [32] seems to apply.