With genotypes 4, 5, and 6 representing a substantial proportion of all HCV infections worldwide and with 4a and 6a also being poorly responsive to conventional therapy,2 it is crucial that these genotypes are considered in the future development of PIs and other antiviral therapy. Although not as potent as BILN 2061, telaprevir has been shown to be clinically effective in genotype 1-infected patients.12 In
a phase IIa clinical trial, telaprevir also demonstrated substantial activity in genotype 2-infected patients but only limited efficacy in genotypes 3- and 4-infected individuals, for whom as a result treatment was stopped.13, 14 As Talazoparib datasheet demonstrated by our in vitro studies, telaprevir also shows considerable differences in MK-1775 supplier potency against different genotypes, observations that highlight again the potential value of evaluating PIs on all genotypes
before clinical assessment. We found that genotypes 1b and 6a were the most susceptible to telaprevir, followed by 2a, then 3a, and genotypes 4a and 5a being the most resistant. Based on the in vitro findings, genotype 6a- but not 4a- and 5a-infected patients might therefore be effectively treated by this antiviral in the future. However, in this specific case where relatively smaller genotype-associated differences in IC50 values for telaprevir have been found, it is necessary to investigate the extent of within-subtype variability in susceptibility and whether this might have a significant impact on clinical effectiveness. For example, in previous studies, catalytic efficiencies within a subtype were shown to vary widely (by up to 7-fold), especially within genotypes 1a and 1b.30, 31 We have shown that different isolates of genotype 3a exhibited at least 3-fold variability in IC50 values (130 nM to 310 nM) against BILN 2061, attributable to naturally occurring amino acid changes in the protease domain of NS3.16 These strain-associated differences may indeed account for the discrepancies between genotype 3 and 4 susceptibilities in the in vitro system with clinical susceptibility data.13, 14 However, the chimera model correctly reports
their much poorer response compared to genotype 1 and 2. The rapid selection of drug-resistant genetic variants is a major problem substantially limiting the effectiveness of antiviral therapy for HCV.21 Mathematical modeling Histidine ammonia-lyase has suggested that all possible single- and double-mutant viruses already preexist before treatment32 and can be rapidly selected at the start of antiviral therapy. Identification of potential resistance mutations within the individual genotypes towards the different PIs is crucial to preidentify individuals with preexisting resistant variants and adjust treatment options accordingly. We induced resistance mutations in vitro through passaging the intra- and intergenotypic recombinants under subinhibitory concentrations of PIs. Several new potential resistance loci were identified (Fig. 4; Tables 2, 3).