006).”" In the main “”Results”" section of the article The sentence under the heading “” EGFR protein expression “” read: “”The positive rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor cells were 46%, which was significantly higher than its expression in normal lung (p = 0.0234) and paracancerous (p = 0.020)”" Which should have been: “”The positive
rate of EGFR protein in NSCLC tumor cells were 46%, which was significantly higher than its expression in normal lung (p = 0.034) and paracancerous (p = 0.020)”" Under the heading “” Correlation between EGFR expression and clinical features “” The second sentence read: “”It shows that the difference of EGFR expression was only significant between the nodal positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs.10%, p = 0.04).”" But the passage should have been “”The expression of EGFR in different subgroups were compared check details and summarized in Table three. It shows that the difference of EGFR expression was only significant between the nodal positive and negative subgroups (56.4% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.006). There is no significant difference between age (60 vs. under 60 ys), gender, adeno- vs. non-adenocarcinoma, the differentiation of tumor, and staging.”" This is the correct table three (table 1). Table 1 (corrected table 3). EGFR expression and clinical characteristics Clinical features EGFR Positive expression rate P value negative positive
Ages 0.448 < 60 18 14 43.80% ≥60 9 9 50% Sex 0.445 Male 16 15 48.40% Female 11 8 42.10% Pathologic type 0.543 Squamous carcinoma MK-2206 in vitro 13 8 38.10% Adencarcinoma 13 13 50.0% Mixed type 1 2 66.70% Tumor length 0.535 ≤3 cm 9 7 43.80% > 3 cm 18 16 47.10% Level of Differentiation 0.474 Poor Differentiated 6 4 40% Moderate and Well Differentiated 21 19 47.50% TNM Stage 0.194 I-II 10 5 33.30% III-IV 17 18 51.40% Lymph node 0.006* N0 10 1 9.10% N1-3 17 22 56.40% *P < 0.05
Correct tables four (table 2), five (table 3) and six (table 4). Table 2 (corrected table four) COX-2 expression in neoplastic and normal tissue Tissue type Number of www.selleck.co.jp/products/sorafenib.html cases COX-2 Positive rate(%) P value positive negative Neoplastic tissue 50 45 5 90 0.000* Normal tissue 6 0 6 0 P < 0.05 Table 3 (corrected table five) COX-2 expression in tumor and paracancerous tissue Tissue type Number of cases COX-2 Positive rate(%) P value positive negative Neoplastic tissue 50 45 5 90 0.000* Paracancerous tissue 7 1 6 14.3 P < 0.05 Table 4 (corrected table six) 6 COX-2 expression and correlation with clinical features Clinical features COX-2 Positive expression rate P value negative positive Ages 0.599 ≤60 3 30 90.90% > 60 2 15 88.20% Sex 0.362 Male 4 27 87.10% Female 1 18 94.70% Pathologic type 0.022* Squamous carcinoma 5 16 76.20% Adencarcinoma 0 26 100% Mixed type 0 3 100% Tumor length 0.518 ≤3 cm 2 14 87.50% > 3 cm 3 31 91.20% Level of Differentiation 0.